New research reveals you can build muscle and strength just as effectively by stopping 1-2 reps short of failure, making workouts less painful and more sustainable.
A groundbreaking study from CUNY Lehman College shows that single-set strength training workouts can build muscle and strength effectively without pushing to muscular failure—the point where you can't perform another rep. This finding could revolutionize how busy people approach fitness, offering a time-efficient alternative that's less uncomfortable and more sustainable.
What Makes Single-Set Training Different?
Traditional strength training typically involves performing 2-3 sets of each exercise, but single-set training cuts this down to just one set per exercise. Instead of doing three sets of 6-12 squats, you'd perform just one set of 6-12 repetitions, effectively reducing training time by at least half.
The research team investigated whether reaching muscular failure was necessary for results. "This can be problematic for some individuals as reaching failure causes high levels of perceived discomfort and negative post-exercise feelings, which may be a deterrent to long-term exercise adherence," the researchers explained.
How Did Researchers Test This Theory?
The study divided experienced weight trainers into two groups, both performing identical single-set workouts twice weekly for eight weeks. Each session included 9 exercises with 8-12 repetitions and two minutes of rest between exercises, lasting about 30 minutes total.
The key difference was intensity:
- Failure Group: Lifted until they couldn't perform another repetition in good form
- Sub-Failure Group: Stopped 1-2 repetitions short of their maximum capacity
- Training Schedule: Both groups exercised twice weekly on non-consecutive days
What Were the Surprising Results?
The results showed little difference between the two approaches. While the failure group showed marginally greater increases in quadriceps and triceps size, both groups achieved similar improvements in muscle strength and muscular endurance. "Improvements in measures of strength and local muscular endurance appear to be independent of proximity-to-failure," the researchers concluded.
What makes these findings particularly impressive is that participants were already experienced—university-age individuals who had been strength training at least three times weekly for over a year. This wasn't beginner gains but genuine improvements in already-trained individuals.
"Thus, trainees can realize beneficial effects from time-efficient routines with less discomfort than believed," the research team noted, suggesting this approach could help more people stick to regular strength training.
For time-crunched individuals struggling to fit the recommended two weekly strength sessions into busy schedules, this research offers hope. The 30-minute workout format provides a practical solution that doesn't compromise results while reducing the physical and mental barriers that often derail exercise routines.
Next in Fitness
→ Golf Might Be Your Next Best Workout—If You Skip the CartPrevious in Fitness
← Want to Lose Weight? Here's Exactly How Much Exercise You Actually NeedSource
This article was created from the following source:
More from Fitness
The Walking Workout Revolution: Why 2026 Could Be the Year You Ditch High-Intensity Fitness
Japanese walking surged nearly 3,000% in searches in 2025. This simple interval-walking method alternates between fast and slow paces—and research sho...
Mar 4, 2026
Why Strength Training Might Matter More Than You Think—Even If You Never Step Foot in a Gym
Strength training reduces early death risk by 10-17% and builds the physical foundation for independence as you age. Here's what the research actually...
Mar 3, 2026
AFib Doesn't Mean You Have to Stop Moving: Here's What Safe Exercise Actually Looks Like
People with atrial fibrillation who stay active are 45% less likely to die over nine years. Here's how to exercise safely with AFib....
Mar 3, 2026